[報導]你的頭值多少錢

這要從一篇報導開始
標題是半罩式安全帽 較不傷頸椎
這篇的大意是鼓勵大家戴半罩
因為全罩有頸椎受傷造成癱瘓的可能性
此篇一出來馬上被公幹到不行 簡單說戴半罩出車禍腦袋都飛了
頸椎受不受傷已經不重要了
所以後來又有人提供這樣的報導
http://www.erika.idv.tw/trackback.php?tbID=248&extra=dr5pv8p32k
後來呢
有人寫信去給原教授
以下是原教授的原文回覆
作者: Haiker (單純偏執狂) 看板: biker
標題: Re: [新聞] 半罩式安全帽 較不傷頸椎
時間: Thu Dec 20 02:34:13 2007


轉自東吳機研部品板

有板友找到發表原文的教授

也取得回應並同意公開此段回信:p

都是原文，看得懂的就看

不想看英文的

結論我直接告訴大家，原教授同意全罩式是優於半罩or3/4(open face)

"I believe that full-faced helmets are better than open helmets."



----
楊博士已同意在所有區域公開其回應

但是為求謹慎 請各位轉錄時 請把全文轉錄

由於是回應我的信件 懇請各位一併把我的信件附上 把過程全部呈現

以下是全文


From: wisey@pipeline.com
To: darsting@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: about full-face motorcycle helmets, response from Taiwan
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:48:15 -0500

Can you please give me the URL for what I was supposed to have said.
I don't recall saying that full-faced motorcycle helmets
are more dangerous than open-faced ones.
I may have been misinterpreted or misquoted.
I remember talking to a reporter in Taiwan about how modern helmets
have higher backs and that this is a good because it reduces
the risk of spinal cord injury.
I was referring only to the rear and praised this development.
I believe that full-faced helmets are better than open helmets.


Wise.

我的再回覆

Hi, I didn't expect that you replied so soon.
I have to apologize for misunderstanding you.
Our reporters did not do their job well and
made her report being misleading and let you take the heat.
There has been so many mortorcyclist saying sth bad about you.
I will explaine your reply to them on the bbs or other websites.
Is it ok that I post your reply on those bbs systems or websites?

Here is the link of the article.
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/071218/4/q48y.html
Sorry, I shouldn't say 'your article'. It's a report of our reporters.

Dustin Wu.
楊的再回覆

Yes, you may quote me.


Wise.


簡單來說就是記者的刻意誤導
請大家看新聞時 相信自己的判斷力
不要被媒體牽著鼻子走
現在的報導許多充滿不實跟聳動 科學素養在此時似乎是個很有用的東西阿